Assessment

Assessment in art, craft, and design enables teachers and their pupils to consider, record, and enhance all aspects of pupils’ learning and achievement.

Teachers do this by considering, not only what pupils make, but also how they make it. They assess the skills students acquire, their critical and contextual thinking and the creative behaviours they develop. Assessment takes into account what students know and learn about the tools and materials they use. This includes a consideration of how students connect their practical knowledge with their understanding of art, craft, and design and the broader cultural and social context of their work.

Teachers assess progress in art, craft and design using a range of evidence. They consider the quality of the products pupils make and the skills they exhibit as they use tools, materials and processes. To assess their knowledge, teachers listen to pupils talking about art, craft and design, read what they write and evaluate evidence of creatively applied knowledge in the sketchbooks.

The evidence for assessment occurs in different forms and at different times throughout a unit of work, so assessment too is spread out over time. It is unnecessary to assess everything (formative assessment) simultaneously, or to leave it all until the end of the unit (summative assessment). Instead, these assessments are used over time to build a broader profile of achievement across all progress objectives.

Effective assessment systems ensure that there are two principle approaches, assessment for learning (formative) and assessment of learning (summative).

  • Assessment for learning is typically short-term, given as verbal feedback to each pupil/student in the classroom or written as notes inserted into relevant sketchbooks pages, to identify where improvement is needed and to address specified success criteria. Some assessment for learning strategies include peer and self review and negotiated short-term targets for improvement.
  • Assessment of learning is typically recorded as a statement, mark or grade as part of recording and reporting procedures, to provide clear assessment information for all who need it (teachers, subject leaders and senior leaders) and in a form that is relevant and useful. Recipients of assessment information will include pupils/students and their parents/carers, internal school records. These might include examination results which also inform external records.

Progression in art, craft and design happens over time (project, term, year and key stage) as pupils/students self-assess and their teachers assess their pupils’/students’ increasing confidence, creative, critical, contextual and technical development.  Progress should demonstrate evidence of improvement towards greater control and mastery (quality evident) in developing and using skills, informed by deepening knowledge and understanding.

Progression is supported and recorded by ensuring that assessment criteria (such as success criteria for a lesson or project) are clear and progress is recorded for each progress objective creating a broad profile of achievement.

Content Overview

High quality Assessment for Learning is implicit in better practice, whereas Assessment of Learning may be part of better practice, but more of a requirement of school assessment systems.

Although some suggest evaluating items of art and design is a subjective matter thus making assessment impossible, what is clear is that teaching is objective driven and teachers aim to help their pupils achieve success in meeting specific criteria. This means that assessment and progress is about determining how well learners meet the objective/s set. The assessment, recording and reporting of that achievement is a requirement schools make of teachers and is a pupil entitlement.

Promoting progress is therefore concerned with providing learners with the right feedback and at the right moment to best support their creative/artistic growth and improvement. This kind of formative feedback is about determining the gap between where learners are and where they need to be in the context of knowledge, skills, behaviours and their ability to apply this and progress towards, meet or exceed the defined expectation. Thus closing the gap or achieving mastery in this specific context.

Clarification of standards:

Art and design educators are required to assess against the notion of a ‘national standard’ which we define as an expectation of a typical age related standard, i.e. the quality of work that children of the same age should typically be able to achieve. In truth, this is defined by consensus amongst art educators through internal moderation, but also partly using GCSE and examination standards at age 16 and calculated back-down through Year groups from that point.

  • Primary colleagues will rely on experience of what children typically produce, to determine middle, upper and lower bands of expectation. As non-specialists, it is very helpful to have assembled a portfolio of exemplars, selected over time and annotated to illustrate and define the range of standards.
  • Evidence of standards can be found in the assessment of process and outcome. Process evidence typically includes: designing, investigations and experimentation, a sketchbook, preparatory studies, modelling or prototypes. The outcome is the product of a project e.g. painting, prints, sculpture, illustration, photographs, animated film, textile piece etc.
  • Any national or regional ‘standard’ should relate to a portfolio of exemplars in the school or available online. Schools can choose to keep their own portfolio of standards, augmented with examination board guidance.
  • In England, Ofsted inspectors reference a ‘national standard’ without visual exemplars. Inspectors, schools and teachers are expected to have an understanding of the expected standard for each year group and in the context of any medium, process or technique. 
  • Assessment of examination work and feedback to students must comply with the relevant Examination Board’s guidance and should also take account of JCQ guidance for Non-Examination Assessments.   

Types of Assessment


Types of Assessment: 

  • Diagnostic Assessment
  • Formative Assessment
  • Ipsative Assessment
  • Summative Assessment

Assessment can be used to:

  • Diagnostic assessment is important for learning in art and design.
  • Formative and summative assessments are both necessary to monitor progress, to identify help for learners, and to inform further teaching and learning.
  • Self-assessment (ipsative) is particularly relevant in the discipline of art and design where work can take many iterations before reaching the outcome or solution. It enables learners to review, modify and improve their work independently.
  • Peer assessment is a useful technique for learners to learn from one another; for learners to articulate their ideas verbally to others, and for learners to gain additional perspective through listening to their peers’ thoughts about their work.  

Links

References

  • See the Big Landscape 'How' Block titled Student Experience (teacher plan, prepare and deliver) here
  • See NSEAD’s  Assessment and Progression here
  • See NSEAD Developing objective-led lessons here
  • See NSEAD Assessment statements KS1-4 here 
  • See NSEAD Effective Assessment here
  • An example of Peer Assessment here

cross linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram